Catshirt

It always Official Wu-tang Sunset Shirt shocks me when i'm on a browser/computer that doesn't have adblock and I see ads and commercials everywhere. I used to use Firefox on my iPad to watch YouTube. Ad once in a while. What happened lately? Like 3 ads per video, and my old trick of just refreshing the page doesn't even work half the time! Just loads a new ad. It should be in the firefox store if available. I recommend ublock origin. You can use firefox focus which has native ad blocking or just use adguard. "We estimate we can cover up to 80% of a user's visual field before inducing seizures." - Nolan Sorrento. I don't use adblock cause the only way to support people i watch weekly is by ad revenue, since i don't have income as a student. Buy it:  Official Wu-tang Sunset Shirt Premium Trending Shirt This is Season Teeshirtcat-Custom-Tshirt  

 However, my site has I'm The Psyc Hot Ic Engineer Everyone Warned You About Halloween Shirt unique content you can’t get elsewhere and it targets a middle class demographic. That being said, if sites charged, say, $1/mo and made it clear you could cancel at any time, most people wouldn’t. bat an eye. Even better, if multiple sites partnered up and offered bundled access I imagine they would get more buy in. I like to look at sites such as Ars Technica. They don’t paywall, do have ads (though I don’t know how crappy the ad situation is since I am a subscriber), but they offer a subscription. Their subscription base is huge. Try the uBlock extension, it's an adblocker. works great. so great I don't know what ads you're talking about, in fact. YouTube is unusable without adblock. Buy it:  I'm The Psyc Hot Ic Engineer Everyone Warned You About Halloween Shirt Premium Trending Shirt This is Season Teeshirtcat-Custom-Tshirt

That Husky Buckle Up Buttercup You Just Flipped My Witch Switch Halloween Shirt means this article earned them at least $2,000 in ad revenue, likely more. They would have earned at least this much whether they had 1 ad or 20. If they had 100,000 page views they would have only earned about $200, but that still isn’t bad and that assumes $2/1,000 views. Many sites get more than $2/1,000 views. $4/1,000 views isn’t uncommon. My point absolutely stands. They need to get paid, they'll do it however they can, and the consumer certainly isn't interested in paying them or else the consumer would never see the ads. I don’t know about that part regarding the consumer not being interested in paying them. One of my sites charges $5.00/mo and it has not issue.  Buy it:  Husky Buckle Up Buttercup You Just Flipped My Witch Switch Halloween Shirt Premium Trending Shirt This is Season Teeshirtcat-Custom-Tshirt

 Really drives  Ho-Ho-Holy Schnikes Christmas Shirt home the necessity of ads. If the consumer wont pay, somebody has to. Apparently people are very hostile about journalists getting paid. Did you open the site? Ads are half the problem. The entire UI is clunky and overwhelming. Video automatically stickies to the top. It's just awful front end design. It isn’t hard to make money using ads. I own a number of sites that earn quite a bit of money. The real issue is that most of these sites try to squeeze every last cent from each individual person, destroying the user experience in the process. On top of that, this article likely took a half an hour to write and edit, since it is primarily a fluff piece about the study. Assuming they get a million page views. Buy it:  Ho-Ho-Holy Schnikes Christmas Shirt Premium Trending Shirt This is Season Teeshirtcat-Custom-Tshirt

 2: Forcing Golden Buckle Up Buttercup You Just Flipped My Witch Switch Halloween Shirt people to watch adverts when they’ve explicitly indicated they don’t accept them is fraudulent to the advertiser. The publication is charging the advertiser to show an advert to a person who will specifically react negatively to it. I don’t understand why advertisers put up with it. Who doesn't use an ad blocker these days? I have it on all my devices and have done for probably around 10 years. I have adblockers on, but If something still is unreadable due to pop-ups, I do the "inspect element and then delete" trick, It sometimes helps...Because the Independent is, in fact, dependent on ads? Couldn't be that they can't keep up with journalistic websites that actually have people pay them, could it? Buy it:  Golden Buckle Up Buttercup You Just Flipped My Witch Switch Halloween Shirt Premium Trending Shirt This is Season Teeshirtcat-Custom-Tshirt  

 This Daughter Of The One True King Shirt. Also worth pointing that most sites don't give you the option of paying to remove ads. Although i clearly wouldn't do it for every site i visit, this is something i would be happy to pay for in some cases. Dunno about this site in specific. Btw most news sites i know make things an absolute nightmare if you are on mobile, covering up to 80% of your screen with banners and occasional popups to cover the 20% that is left. Not if you use Ublock Origin they don't. Ublock Origin is the best adblocker I've ever used. I’m all for supporting journalism but there are two problems: 1: I’m not going to sign up for a subscription because I think I might like one article. It’s not an 80s record album. Buy it:  Daughter Of The One True King Shirt Premium Trending Shirt This is Season Teeshirtcat-Custom-Tshirt